2008-12-31

2008 -- The Immortals


2008


List of immortal Musicians passing in 2008 -- tribute by Lawrence Tanter


As the year comes to a conclusion – we pause and say
“So Long” to these Innovators…who passed away in 2008.

We extend our Deepest Respect & Gratitude for the amazing Legacy they left behind. They made our lives better with the ‘Gift of Music’.

Freddie Hubbard…Isaac Hayes…Neal Hefti
Eartha Kitt…Levi Stubbs…Buddy Miles…Joe Beck
Johnny Griffin…Bo Diddley…Teo Macero…Miriam Makeba
Norman Whitfield…Jerry Wexler…Odetta…Jimmy McGriff
Bob Florence…Hiram Bullock…Dave Carpenter
Walt Dickerson…Ronnie Matthews…Al Wilson…Earl Palmer
Dr. George Butler…Mitch Mitchell…Pervis Jackson
William Claxton…Jeryl Busby…Merl Sanders
Carl Evans…Dee Dee Warwick…Jimmy Cleveland
Lee Young…Jo Stafford…Kenny Cox…Dave McKenna
Nappy Brown…Esbjorn Svensson…Gerald Wiggins



They were creative Artists & Contributors, who dedicated their lives to making our journey…Enjoyable!

Their contribution was Remarkable.










2008-12-28

Satellite Radio Still Reaches for the Payday

Article by TIM ARANGO
NY Times
Contributing reporter Bill Carter
Published: December 26, 2008

DID you hear what Howard Stern said the other day? Neither did we. But we read about it on a blog.

Mr. Stern, the ribald radio jock who once commanded attention with each off-color utterance and obscene joke, mused recently on the air that he was thinking of retiring when his contract expires in two years. “This is my swan song,” he said.

Back in the day when Mr. Stern was on free radio and had an audience of 12 million, that remark would have cascaded through the media universe. But by switching to satellite radio three years ago, Mr. Stern swapped cultural cachet for big money.

Then — poof! — Mr. Stern all but disappeared. Even Jay Leno, during a recent interview with The New York Times about his decision to stay at NBC to host a prime-time show, cited Mr. Stern as an example of the dangers of obscurity.

“On radio, Howard to me was a populist. The truck driver, the average guy would listen in the cafe, the truck, the old car that’s 50 years old and still has an AM radio,” said Mr. Leno in the interview. “But I don’t hear him quoted anymore. People don’t say: ‘Hey, did you hear what Howard said today?’ ”

Yet Mr. Stern’s retirement chatter did get one group talking: investors fretting over the fate of Sirius XM Radio, the satellite radio company that has been Mr. Stern’s home for the past three years.

Today, five months after regulators approved a merger of Sirius and XM, satellite radio’s pioneers and former rivals, in a deal that was supposed to deliver their industry to the promised land of profits and permanence, the company faces an uncertain future.

Although Mr. Stern brought listeners and prominence to Sirius, the move had a steep cost. His blockbuster, $500 million, five-year deal fueled a high-stakes competition between the two services that contributed to Sirius XM’s current bind.

Unlike free radio, which depends on advertising, satellite radio offers nearly commercial-free music and talk for a subscription fee. It’s akin to the difference between broadcast TV and premium cable, between NBC and HBO.

Even though Sirius XM is one of the very few media companies whose revenue and number of subscribers are growing these days, a dime and a nickel will get you a share of the company’s stock (with some change left over).

Its balance sheet is larded with nearly $1 billion of debt that matures in 2009 and must be refinanced — but try finding a sympathetic banker in our current hard-luck environment. Sirius XM has nearly 20 million paying customers, many of them evangelists for the service, but what does that matter if you can’t pay your debts?

The company has never turned a profit and cannot predict when it ever will. Cap that with the struggles of Detroit — the bulk of new satellite radio subscribers come from partnerships with automakers — and you have a set of obstacles that Sirius XM has to overcome at the very moment the recession seems to be deepening.

The satellite radio industry is relatively young — when Mr. Stern announced that he was joining Sirius in 2004, the company had less than a million subscribers. But it is facing a media environment that is shifting toward cheaply distributed content over the Internet.

It’s also a conundrum that all traditional media face: Who needs satellites — or, for that matter, printing presses and delivery trucks — when the world is wired for broadband and Wi-Fi?

All of these obstacles have Sirius XM’s investors and subscribers worried that they may even be beyond the significant talents of Mel Karmazin, the combative, longtime radio man who is the company’s chief executive.

“I met Mel through my coverage of radio back when radio was something,” said Bishop Cheen, an analyst at Wachovia Capital Markets in Charlotte, N.C. “He’s an amazing guy. It’s never paid to short Mel. But this is his toughest challenge. It’s something that seems even beyond his legend.”

ON a recent morning that would include more meetings with lenders, and three days before Sirius XM’s annual shareholder meeting — which would be a feisty affair — Mr. Karmazin bounds into a glass-walled conference room at the company’s headquarters and sits for an interview.

He says he would prefer lesser surroundings in someplace like Astoria, Queens, but the company has a long-term lease — negotiated, Mr. Karmazin is careful to note, before his tenure as C.E.O. — in fancy, Midtown Manhattan quarters near Rockefeller Center

Mr. Karmazin has a helmet of white hair and is thinner than when he was president of Viacom and in perpetual conflict with Sumner M. Redstone, then his boss. On his left lapel is a pin shaped like a jigsaw puzzle that is the emblem of Autism Speaks, a charity in which Mr. Karmazin is deeply involved because he has a grandson with autism.

He begins off-topic, musing about which friends of his may have lost money in the debacle involving Bernard L. Madoff, whom Mr. Karmazin himself had never heard of until the news erupted about two weeks ago. (Mr. Karmazin says all of his money is in Treasury bills and Sirius XM stock.)

“Some of the stories are just horrific,” he says. But given Sirius XM’s current woes, Mr. Karmazin may soon be facing horrors of his own.


He, of course, has been in financial pinches before during his long career. In the early 1980s, he once had to lend money to Infinity Broadcasting, the radio company he helped found, to meet its payroll.

“I don’t think that the performance of the stock is related to the performance of the company,” he says. “It’s related to the balance sheet of the company and the need for the company to refinance.”

Ironically, one rationale for the merger was the expectation that the combined company could borrow money more cheaply. “The bankers who covered the deal believed that one of the synergies of the merger was the ability to refinance at a lower level,” says Mr. Karmazin. What he didn’t count on was the year and a half it took the Federal Communications Commission to approve the deal.

The most pressing problem for Sirius XM is refinancing its debt, which includes three batches worth almost $1 billion that come due in 2009, beginning with $193.5 million in February. It’s a rough task right now, given the frozen credit markets.

Consider this: five years ago, Sirius, with 300,000 subscribers and no hint that Mr. Stern would be gracing its channel lineup, borrowed money at 2.5 percent interest. Those days are long gone.
Warren Buffett managed to get a 10 percent coupon from G.E. and Goldman Sachs,” says Mr. Karmazin, speaking of the interest rate that Mr. Buffett, the Omaha investing legend, was promised for his recent investments in both companies. “So if you are Sirius XM, what should the coupon be?”

Sirius XM simply isn’t a blue-chip stock like General Electric, so the interest the company would have to pay to raise funds is likely to be exorbitant. Mr. Karmazin said many lenders are willing to refinance, “but they are interested in it at very unattractive terms.”

He takes solace in the fact that Sirius XM has growing revenue and is adding subscribers: in the company’s fiscal third quarter, which it reported on Nov. 10, revenue grew 16 percent, to $613 million, and the number of subscribers rose 17 percent, to about 19 million.

“If you take a look around at all of the media space — I’m not trying to paint the rosy picture because we have challenges connected to our liquidity and certainly our stock price is dreadful,” Mr. Karmazin says. “But, you know, our revenues are growing double digits. We’re growing subscribers. We’re not losing subscribers.

“So if would be unfair to compare us to a newspaper business that’s losing circulation and losing revenue, traditional television, traditional radio,” he adds. “They have fundamental company flaws or industry flaws.”

But Sirius XM does have a serious flaw in its capital structure. Its costs, which include servicing its pile of debt, appear to be too high to make the business viable.

Mr. Cheen, the analyst, agrees with Mr. Karmazin that satellite radio is a delightful product and gives him credit for showing revenue growth amid the economic downturn. “But you don’t have any unlevered, free cash flow, dude,” he says of Mr. Karmazin and his company. “In this environment, how do you walk on water?

“This is the drama of it all,” Mr. Cheen continues. “No one is suggesting this media is not a viable media. It’s just poorly capitalized.”

Mr. Karmazin’s corner office on the 37th floor is a flight of stairs up from Mr. Stern’s studio. He and Mr. Stern have known each other since 1985, when Mr. Karmazin hired the shock jock at Infinity. But he is not responsible for Mr. Stern’s jump to Sirius, having joined the company after that deal.

“Would I like to have seen Howard get less money?” Mr. Karmazin asks. “Yes. But I think any company that deals with content would say the same thing.”

Mr. Karmazin, when asked if he thinks Mr. Stern has lost his place in the culture, says: “I think the size of the audience is less today. And I think one of the things Howard was looking forward to with the merger is that we’ll have twice as many subscribers potentially available to listen to him.”

Mr. Stern declined to be interviewed for this article, but his travails are emblematic of satellite radio and Sirius XM’s own shrinking horizons.


It seems that if Mr. Stern were to stay beyond his current contract, which expires at the end of 2010, he would have to accept less money, given the finances of the company and the fact that there are no longer two satellite radio companies battling each other.


“I really can’t speak for what Howard would do,” Mr. Karmazin says. “You know, heavy expectations believe that he would stay. Because why wouldn’t he stay? He’s having a good time. He’s enjoying himself. He’s paid fairly for it.”

But some Stern watchers think otherwise. “I’m starting to think that he might actually retire,” says Mark Mercer, who since the mid-1990s has written a daily blog about the Stern show, which has become a nearly minute-by-minute account of each program.

“I love the show, and I’ve got nothing better to do,” says Mr. Mercer, 40, who lives in Califon, N.J. Even Mr. Mercer, as diehard a Stern fan as there is, acknowledges that Mr. Stern’s gig doesn’t have the same influence it once did.

“Once you get used to hearing it on Sirius, it’s not as shocking as it was when you heard him on terrestrial radio and they’d be bleeping him out,” he says.

SIRIUS XM’s annual meeting on Dec. 18, held in a basement auditorium of a skyscraper elsewhere in Midtown, featured a crew of shareholders holding forth at two microphones in the aisles; a gray-haired man in a brown suede blazer indignant over the loss of his favorite folk music channel; a self-professed inventor who said he developed a computerized golf cart and had an idea about interactive advertising; and a burly, goateed man who claimed to have lost $1 million on Sirius XM stock and stood in the lobby saying, “It’s time for Mel to go, in my opinion.”
With pursed lips and admirable restraint, Mr. Karmazin addresses every question, from the germane to the ridiculous. His famous temper never goes beyond the quip, “I think it would be helpful if we dealt with facts.”

He stays on message, even though the dynamics of his company — continued revenue and subscription growth, but nothing left in the bank at the end of the day — cannot continue forever.

Mr. Karmazin doesn’t duck responsibility by laying his corporate problems on the economy. He tells shareholders at the annual meeting to consider him the company’s Joe Torre and blame him for any and all problems.

“There’s no question, this company needs to make money,” he tells shareholders. “This company has a lot going for it, but it has never made a dime.”

Shareholders approved two measures that analysts consider to be last-ditch possibilities. One, a reverse stock split, would be a way to avoid a delisting from the Nasdaq; if it weren’t for the recent suspension of rules that threaten the pink sheets for stocks that fall below $1 for more than 30 days, Sirius XM would already be facing banishment.

Another measure, to raise money by selling more stock, would be an extreme preventive measure against bankruptcy. A stock sale is seen as unlikely because it would be dilutive to existing shareholders, but executives want this option in their arsenal in case they cannot refinance the debt.

MR. KARMAZIN is one of the few executives who can say his business really is rocket science. Next year Sirius XM will send another satellite into orbit, at a cost of $250 million to $300 million.

Three rocket scientists report to Mr. Karmazin. Whenever he receives e-mail from the person in charge of the satellite — even if it’s just a birthday wish or a thank-you note — the first words of the message have to be “the satellites are fine.”

“If something’s wrong with the satellites, I’m going to panic,” he says.
Mr. Karmazin likes to say that the company competes against technology — things like digital music players and Internet radio that can be streamed through an iPhone and played in the car — rather than other companies.

Dave Zatz, who lives in Rockville, Md., and writes a blog about digital media, was an XM subscriber but dropped the service after his favorite channel, Chrome — “which is sort of a disco station,” he says — was dropped. Now, he says, he streams Pandora, a popular Internet radio service, through his iPhone while driving.

“The price is right and you can get whatever music you like,” he says.
But those competitive threats remain secondary to the urgency of Sirius XM finding a way to extract itself from the financial vise visited upon it by its heavy debt. Mr. Cheen, the debt analyst at Wachovia, has this stark assessment: “The bare economics of it cannot appropriately service the capital load.”

During the shareholder meeting, Mr. Karmazin acknowledges that bankruptcy is a possibility if the company cannot reach agreement with lenders, but he says it is unlikely.

“You have to play the hand you’re dealt,” he says in the interview. “Right now, I don’t like my hand. But we’ll play it.”

2008-12-27

Reboot the FCC


We'll stifle the Skypes and YouTubes of the future if we don't demolish the regulators that oversee our digital pipelines.

Newsweek
Dec 23, 2008

Economic growth requires innovation. Trouble is, Washington is practically designed to resist it. Built into the DNA of the most important agencies created to protect innovation, is an almost irresistible urge to protect the most powerful instead.

The FCC is a perfect example. Born in the 1930s, at a time when the utmost importance was put on stability, the agency has become the focal point for almost every important innovation in technology. It is the presumptive protector of the Internet, and the continued regulator of radio, TV and satellite communications. In the next decades, it could well become the default regulator for every new communications technology, including, and especially, fantastic new ways to use wireless technologies, which today carry television, radio, internet, and cellular phone signals through the air, and which may soon provide high-speed internet access on-the-go, something that Google cofounder Larry Page calls "wifi on steroids."

If history is our guide, these new technologies are at risk, and with them, everything they make possible. With so much in its reach, the FCC has become the target of enormous campaigns for influence. Its commissioners are meant to be "expert" and "independent," but they've never really been expert, and are now openly embracing the political role they play. Commissioners issue press releases touting their own personal policies. And lobbyists spend years getting close to members of this junior varsity Congress. Think about the storm around former FCC Chairman Michael Powell's decision to relax media ownership rules, giving a green light to the concentration of newspapers and television stations into fewer and fewer hands. This is policy by committee, influenced by money and power, and with no one, not even the President, responsible for its failures.

The solution here is not tinkering. You can't fix DNA. You have to bury it. President Obama should get Congress to shut down the FCC and similar vestigial regulators, which put stability and special interests above the public good. In their place, Congress should create something we could call the Innovation Environment Protection Agency (iEPA), charged with a simple founding mission: "minimal intervention to maximize innovation." The iEPA's core purpose would be to protect innovation from its two historical enemies—excessive government favors, and excessive private monopoly power.

Since the birth of the Republic, the U.S. government has been in the business of handing out "exclusive rights" (a.k.a., monopolies) in order to "promote progress" or enable new markets of communication. Patents and copyrights accomplish the first goal; giving away slices of the airwaves serves the second. No one doubts that these monopolies are sometimes necessary to stimulate innovation. Hollywood could not survive without a copyright system; privately funded drug development won't happen without patents. But if history has taught us anything, it is that special interests—the Disneys and Pfizers of the world—have become very good at clambering for more and more monopoly rights. Copyrights last almost a century now, and patents regulate "anything under the sun that is made by man," as the Supreme Court has put it. This is the story of endless bloat, with each round of new monopolies met with a gluttonous demand for more.
The problem is that the government has never given a thought to when these monopolies help, and when they're merely handouts to companies with high-powered lobbyists. The iEPA's first task would thus be to reverse the unrestrained growth of these monopolies. For example, much of the wireless spectrum has been auctioned off to telecom monopolies, on the assumption that only by granting a monopoly could companies be encouraged to undertake the expensive task of building a network of cell towers or broadcasting stations. The iEPA would test this assumption, and essentially ask the question: do these monopolies do more harm than good? With a strong agency head, and a staff absolutely barred from industry ties, the iEPA could avoid the culture of favoritism that's come to define the FCC. And if it became credible in its monopoly-checking role, the agency could eventually apply this expertise to the area of patents and copyrights, guiding Congress's policymaking in these special-interest hornet nests.

The iEPA's second task should be to assure that the nation's basic communications infrastructure spectrum— the wires, cables and cellular towers that serve as the highways of the information economy—remain open to new innovation, no matter who owns them. For example, "network neutrality" rules, when done right, aim simply to keep companies like Comcast and Verizon from skewing the rules in favor of or against certain types of content and services that run over their networks. The investors behind the next Skype or Amazon need to be sure that their hard work won't be thwarted by an arbitrary decision on the part of one of the gatekeepers of the Net. Such regulation need not, in my view, go as far as some Democrats have demanded. It need not put extreme limits on what the Verizons of the world can do with their network—they did, after all, build it in the first place—but no doubt a minimal set of rules is necessary to make sure that the Net continues to be a crucial platform for economic growth.
Beyond these two tasks, what's most needed from the iEPA is benign neglect. Certainly, it should keep competition information flowing smoothly and limit destructive regulation at the state level, and it might encourage the government to spend more on public communications infrastructure, for example in the rural areas which private companies often ignore. But beyond these limited tasks, whole phone-books worth of regulation could simply be erased. And with it, we would remove many of the levers that lobbyists use to win favors to protect today's monopolists.
America's economic future depends upon restarting an engine of innovation and technological growth. A first step is to remove the government from the mix as much as possible. This is the biggest problem with communication innovation around the world, as too many nations who should know better continue to preference legacy communication monopolies. It is a growing problem in our own country as well, as corporate America has come to believe that investments in influencing Washington pay more than investments in building a better mousetrap. That will only change when regulation is crafted as narrowly as possible. Only then can regulators serve the public good, instead of private protection. We need to kill a philosophy of regulation born with the 20th century, if we're to make possible a world of innovation in the 21st.

Lessig is a professor at Stanford Law School and the author of five books, including most recently "Remix: Making Art and Commerce Thrive in the Hybrid Economy."

© 2008

2008-12-22

Presidential Inaugural Honorary Co-Chairs

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: PIC Communications Office
Monday, December 22, 2008 202-203-1700

Presidential Inaugural Committee Announces Honorary Co-Chairs

Bipartisan Collection of Distinguished Americans to Help Lead Inaugural Activities

WASHINGTON, D.C. - Today, the 2009 Presidential Inaugural Committee announced the honorary co-chairs for the Inauguration of President-elect Barack Obama and Vice President-elect Joe Biden.

In keeping with the President-elect's commitment to an inclusive and bipartisan Inauguration, the list of honorary co-chairs includes members of the President-elect and Vice President-elect's immediate families as well as prominent Americans from both sides of the aisle who have dedicated their lives to selfless service to their fellow citizens.

"Vice President-elect Biden and I are grateful to these distinguished men and women for agreeing to serve as Honorary Co-Chairs for the Inauguration," said President-elect Obama. "From family members to former Presidents, each of these leaders has an unwavering commitment to bipartisan cooperation and a proud record of service to their community and our country. They exemplify the spirit of unity and shared purpose this Inauguration will reflect."

The Honorary Co-Chairs for the 2009 Presidential Inauguration are:

President Jimmy Carter
President George H. W. Bush
President William J. Clinton
Mayor Adrian Fenty
Senator Dick Durbin
Senator Dick Lugar
Senator Claire McCaskill
Representative Tammy Baldwin
Representative Artur Davis
Representative Ray Lahood
Representative Linda Sánchez
General Colin Powell
Hunter and Kathleen Biden
Craig Robinson
Dr. Maya Soetoro-Ng

For the latest information on the 2009 Presidential Inauguration, please visit http://www.pic2009.org/page/m2/14907f20/57840f4a/2a8c8437/607ee39c/2325115016/VEsH/.

2008-12-20

Pollution Exemption Reversed


Court Strikes Rule That Let Oil Plants Sometimes Exceed Limits


By Juliet Eilperin
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, December 20, 2008; Page A02

In a 2 to 1 decision yesterday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit struck down an exemption that for nearly 15 years has allowed refineries, chemical plants and other industrial facilities to exceed federal air pollution limits during certain periods of operation.

Environmental groups hailed the ruling, which overturned a provision, enacted under President Bill Clinton, that permits industrial operations that are starting up, shutting down or malfunctioning to emit more toxins into the air than is normally allowed. The Environmental Protection Agency and an array of business groups argued that the exemption was essential, but the court determined that it was illegal.

The ruling affects sources of air pollution across the country: Texas alone has 250 industrial sites, including oil refineries, chemical plants and petrochemical plants, that are affected.
"Citizens will be able to breathe cleaner air with greatly reduced levels of toxic chemicals released, especially people living in the fence-line neighborhoods near Texas's refineries and chemical plants where start-up, shutdown and maintenance emissions have been a huge pollution problem for decades," said Neil Carman, a former Texas state refinery inspector who is now clean air director for the Sierra Club's Texas chapter.

It is unclear whether the EPA will appeal. Agency spokesman Jonathan Shradar said, "EPA is disappointed by the court's ruling, and we will be reviewing the decision as we determine steps moving forward."

The agency created the exemption in 1994, and Bush administration officials broadened the interpretation of the provision over time. This made it subject to judicial review, and a coalition of advocacy groups including the Environmental Integrity Project, the Sierra Club, the Louisiana Environmental Action Network, the Coalition for a Safe Environment and Friends of Hudson challenged the provision's legality in court.

"What they did is take a bad provision and turn it into an almost complete barrier to enforcement," said Earthjustice attorney Jim Pew, who argued the case on behalf of the coalition. "This was an attempt to make all of the air-toxics laws unenforceable, and they almost got away with it."

Pew said industrial facilities routinely violated federal air standards under the guise of malfunctions, but industry representatives said these excesses were a necessary part of operations. Richard Alonso, a lawyer at Bracewell & Giuliani who represents oil refineries, said the plants often need to flare off volatile gases when they start up.

"These sources are already doing the best they can to reduce their emissions during these times," said Alonso, who worked in the EPA's office of enforcement and compliance from 2001 to 2007. "It's a big setback for refineries, and not just refineries but other industry sectors."
Alonso predicted that the next administration would have to devote "big resources" to rewriting regulations to comply with the court's ruling.

2008-12-17

Inaugural Program January 20th, 2009

For Immediate Release
Dec. 17, 2008

JCCIC ANNOUNCES INAUGURAL PROGRAM

Line-up Includes Musical Greats Aretha Franklin, Yo-Yo Ma and Itzhak Perlman

WASHINGTON, DC - Senator Dianne Feinstein, Chairman of the Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies, today announced the program for the 56th Presidential Inauguration, which will take place on the West Front of the U.S. Capitol on January 20, 2009.

"I am delighted to announce this superb line-up of participants in the 2009 inaugural ceremonies," said Senator Feinstein. "The inauguration of President-elect Barack Obama will be an event of historic proportion. It is appropriate that the program will include some of the world's most gifted artists from a wide range of backgrounds and genres."

The program participants were invited by the Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies and chosen by the Chairman, the Presidential-elect and the Vice President-elect. In addition to Senator Feinstein, the members of the Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies include: Senator Bob Bennett, Ranking Member of the Senate Rules Committee; Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid; Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi; House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer; and House Republican Leader John Boehner.

The order of the program will be as follows:

Musical SelectionsThe United States Marine Band

Musical Selections: The San Francisco Boys Chorus and the San Francisco Girls Chorus

Call to Order and Welcoming Remarks: The Honorable Dianne Feinstein

Invocation Dr. Rick Warren, Saddleback Church, Lake Forest, CA

Musical Selection: Aretha Franklin

Oath of Office: Administered to Vice President-elect Joseph R. Biden, Jr. by Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, the Honorable John Paul Stevens

Musical Selection: John Williams, composer/arrangerItzhak Perlman, ViolinYo-Yo Ma, CelloGabriela Montero, PianoAnthony McGill, Clarinet

Oath of Office: Administered to President-elect Barack H. Obama by the Chief Justice of the United States, the Honorable John G. Roberts, Jr.

Inaugural Address: The President of the United States, The Honorable Barack H. Obama

Poem: Elizabeth Alexander

Benediction: The Reverend Dr. Joseph E. Lowery

The National Anthem: The United States Navy Band "Sea Chanters"
Biographies

Elizabeth Alexander is a poet, essayist, playwright, and teacher. She is the author of four books and was a finalist for the 2005 Pulitzer Prize. She has received many grants and honors, most recently the Alphonse Fletcher, Sr. Fellowship for work that "contributes to improving race relations in American society and furthers the broad social goals of the U.S. Supreme Court's Brown v. Board of Education decision of 1954," and the 2007 Jackson Prize for Poetry. She is a professor at Yale University and was a fellow at the Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University this year.

Aretha Franklin is often described as "The Queen of Soul." In a career spanning more than 50 years, she has earned a reputation as one of the greatest singers of our time, with a repertoire that includes soul, jazz, rock, blues, pop, and gospel. Franklin has won 21 Grammy Awards, including the Living Legend Grammy and the Lifetime Achievement Grammy. In 1987, she became the first woman to be inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame. Other awards include the National Medal of Arts, the Presidential Medal of Freedom, and the Kennedy Center Honors.

The Reverend Dr. Joseph E. Lowery, considered the dean of the civil rights movement, co-founded along with Martin Luther King, Jr., the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) and served as president and chief executive officer from 1977 to January 15, 1998. He served as pastor of Atlanta's oldest predominantly Black United Methodist congregation, Central Methodist Gardens for 18 years, and as pastor of Cascade United Methodist Church from 1986 to 1992.

Anthony McGill is the principal clarinetist of the New York Metropolitan Orchestra, a member of the Peabody Conservatory faculty in clarinet, and a much sought after soloist and chamber musician. A graduate of the Curtis Institute, he is a recipient of the prestigious Avery Fisher Career Grant, a program designed to provide support for up-and-coming instrumentalists. He has performed at many music festivals, and appeared as a soloist with the symphony orchestras of Baltimore, New Jersey, and Hilton Head, and performed at Lincoln Center as a member of Chamber Music Society Two. McGill has also toured Europe and Japan with a chamber ensemble including Mitsuko Uchida and members of the Brentano String Quartet.

Yo-Yo Ma is a world renowned cellist, educator, and ambassador for the arts. His recordings are among the most successful recordings in the classical field, and reflect his wide-ranging interest in many musical genres and traditions. He began studying the cello at age four. He studied at the Juilliard School, and is a graduate of Harvard University. His awards include the Avery Fisher Prize, the Glenn Gould Prize, and the National Medal of the Arts. Appointed a CultureConnect Ambassador by the United States Department of State in 2002, Yo-Yo Ma has met with, trained, and mentored thousands of students worldwide. In 2006, Secretary General Kofi Annan named him a U.N. Messenger of Peace, and in 2007 Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon extended his appointment.

Gabriela Montero is a pianist known both for her impeccable classical playing and her improvisational gift. Montero gave her first public performance at the age of five. At age eight she made her concert debut with the Venezuelan Youth Orchestra, and was granted a scholarship to study in the United States. At twelve she won the Baldwin National Competition and AMSA Young Artist International Piano Competition. She won the Bronze Medal at the 13th International Chopin Piano Competition in Warsaw in 1995, and since then has played at recital halls and festivals around the world. Her recordings include both performances of well known classical compositions, as well as improvisations on themes by Bach and other classical composers.

Itzhak Perlman is one of the greatest violinists of our time. Following his training at the Academy of Music in Tel Aviv and the Julliard School, Perlman won the prestigious Leventritt Competition in 1964. Since then, Perlman has performed with every major orchestra throughout the world. He has also conducted orchestras including the Berlin Philharmonic, the London Philharmonic, the Concertgebouw Orchestra, the Israel Philharmonic, the Chicago Symphony, and the New York Philharmonic. He has won 15 Grammy Awards, four Emmy Awards, and numerous other awards including the Kennedy Center Honors, the National Medal of Arts, and the Medal of Liberty, presented by President Reagan in 1986 to honor the nation's most distinguished naturalized citizens during the centennial celebration of the Statue of Liberty. Perlman is also an educator, teaching at the Perlman Music Program and the Juilliard School, where he holds the Dorothy Richard Starling Foundation Chair.

Dr. Rick Warren founded Saddleback Church in Lake Forest, California, in 1980 with one family. Today, it is an evangelical congregation averaging 22,000 weekly attendees, a 120-acre campus, and has more than 300 community ministries to groups such as prisoners, CEOs, addicts, single parents, and those with HIV/AIDS. He also leads the Purpose Driven Network of churches, a global coalition of congregations in 162 countries. TIME magazine named him one of "15 World Leaders Who Mattered Most in 2004," and in 2005 one of the "100 Most Influential People in the World."

The San Francisco Boys Chorus (SFBC) was founded in 1948 and has become an internationally acclaimed Grammy-award winning organization. The chorus has over 240 singers from 50 Bay Area cities and more than 120 schools at three Bay Area campuses. SFBC has toured in four continents where they performed for dignitaries such as: Pope John Paul II, HRH Queen Elizabeth II of England, King Carl XVI Gustav of Sweden, HM Prince of Wales, the President of the former Soviet Union, and U.S presidents. SFBC celebrated their 60 year anniversary this year.
The San Francisco Girls Chorus (SFGC) is comprised of more than 300 singers, ages 7-18, from 160 schools in 44 Bay Area cities. SFGC was founded in 1978 and has become a regional center for choral music education and performance. The Chorus can also be heard on several San Francisco Symphony recordings, including three Grammy Award-winners. In 2001, SFGC became the first youth chorus to win the prestigious Margaret Hillis Award given annually by Chorus America to a chorus that demonstrates artistic excellence, a strong organizational structure, and a commitment to education.

The United States Marine Band, founded in 1798 by an Act of Congress, is America's oldest professional musical organization. Also called "The President's Own," the Marine Band is celebrated for its role at the White House and its dynamic public performances. The Marine Band performs a varied repertoire including new works for wind ensemble, traditional concert band literature, challenging orchestral transcriptions, and the patriotic marches that made it famous. The band frequently features its members in solo performances that highlight their virtuosity and artistry.
The United States Navy Band "Sea Chanters" is the official chorus of the United States Navy. In 1956, Lt. Harold Fultz, then the Band's assistant leader, organized an all male group of singers from the Navy School of Music in Anacostia for the State of the Nation dinner. The group was an instant success, so Admiral Arleigh Burke, Chief of Naval Operations, transferred them to the Navy Band, named them the "Sea Chanters," and gave them the mission of carrying on the songs of the sea. Women joined the "Sea Chanters" in 1980. The chorus appears throughout the United States and has also sung with the Boston Pops Esplanade Orchestra, the Baltimore Symphony, and the Cincinnati Pops Orchestra.

2008-12-14

Arbitrons' Portable People Meter ("PPM") Criticized


Early indicators of the PPM system are that Urban music formats' ratings are down in participating markets (with the exception of Houston), and 'general market' Music and News stations' ratings are flat or up. National Association of Black Owned Broadcaster's ("NABOB") Executive Director Jim Winston illustrates both the radio stations' ratings advances and declines in his "June 29th FCC testimony" and Winston's testimony to the Telecommunications Subcommittee in the links below (listed as "June 29th, 2008").

December 5th, 2007: Testimony by NABOB's Jim Winston to the Subcommittee on Telecommunications and the Internet of the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the United States House of Representatives. http://energycommerce.house.gov/cmte_mtgs/110-ti-hrg.120507.Winston-testimony.pdf

July 29th, 2008: Testimony of the National Association of Black-Owned Broadcasters (NABOB) Executive Director Attorney Jim Winston to the Federal Communications Committee (FCC) regarding Portable People Meter (PPM) research methodology...in the link below.
http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/enbanc072908_docs/winston.pdf

In the Washington DC market, insofar as morning/afternoon drive time shows are concerned, I have noticed that the quicker paced shows' ratings hosted by career radio broadcasters are stronger; while the slower-paced, talkative, and non-broadcasters' radio programs' ratings are declining. A good example is WKYS's Air Personalities EZ Street and Russ Parr are #1 (double digit numbers) and #3 respectively in their target 18-34 demo for the Fall Quarter. Having worked with them both, their most telling story is that their show preparation is excellent. EZ and Russ's show elements are up-to-date, entertaining, and interactive with their listeners.

In Atlanta, Tom Joyner is far and above the most listened-to program with double-digit numbers in the most sought after 25-54 demo with an 11.4 ratings share. I have not worked directly with Tom, but have worked with many on his staff that research and prepare for his show daily. All I can say is that they are professional, involved, and tenatious.

The News format, as opposed to the talk format or news-talk format, with their popular "You give us 20 minutes and we'll give you the word" decades old formula, which CBS and Bonneville specializes in, are doing extremely well in "every" major market. The News format is 12-plus number one 12-plus in DC and Atlanta, #2 in Chicago and Philadelphia, #3 in New York, and number four in San Francisco. Major market News formats have the resources, stingers, field reporters, local news emphasis, national news feed, area's traffic/weather -- every ten minutes, quality News anchors, predictable benchmarks, and stress consistent television, newpaper, and billboard advertising.

PPM's are rated 'weekly' so Programmers can adjust quickly. Some Programmers are witnessing that their ratings' advance, outside of drive time, when they program "less talk and more music." The early ratings success of true Radio Broadcasters on the music-formatted stations, and Broadcast Journalist on the News side, so far have proven that their future demand should increase. News may make a comeback on Music stations. Seques 'without an ID in between every song' could also re-appear, since stations are encoded.

While PPM is being evaluated by Management, a New York attorney named Cuomo, disputes the PPM ratings system in New York City.

September 10th, 2008
New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo fights New York's PPM system (link below)
http://www.adweek.com/aw/content_display/news/e3i232ec0fada51eae75e443ee4b82bf96d

After hearing both NABOB's Jim Winston's statements, and further legal actions against Arbitron's New York PPM ratings system by Attorney General Andrew Cuomo, the FCC is seriously considering an investigation regarding the validity of the PPM ratings systems' methodology. Arbitron's PPM system has Mega-Radio Companies, like Clear Channel Communications and Cumulus Communications, concerned enough to switch their small and medium market radio stations from the Arbitron PPM ratings service over to Neilsen's PPM system mid-year.

Arbitron and Neilson partnered to set up the PPM system in Houston, which was accredited by the Media Rating Council ("MRC"). The two ratings companies though split company after Houston. Arbitron subsequently re-arranged the PPM ratings methodlogy in New York and Philadelphia. The newer Arbitron PPM ratings system (different from Houston's) in New York and Philadelphia was "NOT" accreditted by Media Rating Council. The "not" accredited Arbitron PPM service continues its' roll out in other major cities as we read, with Arbitron defying both the FCC and the Media Ratings Council saying that they do not have authority to stop their right to research.

Question: Why does a non-accredited ratings service (PPM) exist at all?

One of the differences in methodlogy that Neilsen promises to use in the future is utilizing a larger sample size. A primary complaint about Arbitrons' PPM system -- including from NABOB's Jim Winston -- is that the sample size is smaller than the previous diary ratings system. In Washington DC, Arbitron's PPM sample size is 1300 people as compared to the previous sample size of 4300 people in Arbitron's previous diary ratings research methodology, which is a whopping seventy percent drop in the sample size for a metro area with a population of over 4.5 million people.

Radio Industry leaders letters' conclusion to Arbitron:

Justification:

The industry is not asking for every market to gain accreditation prior to currency – only that the Radio First PPM system gains accreditation ONE TIME before currency implementation. Also, the diary and Houston PPM methodologies have accreditation; all radio markets should be using an accredited product. This is a reasonable expectation given the critical importance of the data to our underlying business and the substantial increases in rates that accompanied the rollout of PPM. Finally, the MRC code of conduct doesn’t require accreditation prior to currency, but does prefer it - "The MRC prefers that a Participating Measurement Service seeking to replace an accredited currency measurement product with a new currency measurement product (both products provided by the same Participating Measurement Service) uses best efforts to obtain accreditation of the new product prior to its commercialization."

February 28th, 2008

Media Rating Council denies PPM accreditation to Philadelphia and New York:
http://www.mediaratingcouncil.org/0208MRC%20PPM%20Statement.pdf

June 13th, 2008
Arbitron decides to resume its' PPM ratings service without MRC's accreditation:
http://harkerresearch.typepad.com/radioinsights/2008/06/arbitron-makes-it-official-ppm-roll-out-to-resume.html

June 20, 2008
Letter from Radio Companies to Arbitron Re: PPM's roll out without accreditation:
http://ftp.media.radcity.net/ZMST/industryletter.pdf

July 29th, 2008
Statement to FCC from MRC's Executive Director and CEO George Ivie:
http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/enbanc072908_docs/ivie.pdf


After the Radio Industry expressed concern about PPM, FCC's Jonathan Adelstein sends letter to FCC's chariman demanding that the FCC investigate Arbitron's PPM non-accreditted Ratings Research Methodology
(Associate Press article below)

FCC member seeks probe into radio ratings system
November 18, 2008 - 9:42pm
By JOELLE TESSLER AP Technology Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) - One of the two Democrats on the Federal Communications Commission is calling on the agency to investigate whether a new electronic measurement system used by Arbitron Inc. to track radio station listenership is unfairly harming minority broadcasters.

FCC Commissioner Jonathan Adelstein sent a letter Tuesday to FCC Chairman Kevin Martin urging the agency to open a formal investigation into Arbitron's "Portable People Meter" rating service. The new system relies on a pager-like device that automatically records what radio stations a person is listening to in order to measure radio station audiences.

Arbitron's station ratings play a crucial role in determining radio advertising rates.
The company argues that the Portable People Meter is more accurate and reliable than the paper diaries it has historically used to track radio listenership. Arbitron launched the system in Philadelphia in April 2007 and has since rolled it out in New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Houston and San Francisco.

But so far, the service has been accredited by the Media Ratings Council, an industry group, for use only in Houston.

And it has set off alarm bells among minority-owned radio stations and their supporters, who approached the FCC in September about launching a formal investigation. They argue that system has resulted in far lower ratings for many minority broadcasters and pushed down the advertising rates they rely on to stay on the air.

James L. Winston, executive director and general counsel of the National Association of Black Owned Broadcasters, said the fundamental problem is that Arbitron has scaled back the number of listeners it tracks as it has begun using Portable People Meters _ resulting in unrepresentative samples that do not adequately reflect audience sizes for many minority-owned stations.

"It's very easy to get big distortions when you use such small samples," Winston explained.
And this, Adelstein said, poses a major threat to the tiny number of minority-owned stations operating in the United States and the diversity they bring to American airwaves.

According to Free Press, a public interest group, racial and ethnic minorities currently own only 7.7 percent of full-power radio stations nationwide.

The Portable People Meter, Adelstein said, "constitutes a clear and present danger to media diversity."

In a statement Tuesday, Arbitron said the FCC lacks authority to regulate audience ratings, adding that "the reliability and methodologies of audience ratings services are best left to private industry groups such as the Media Rating Council."

Arbitron is already locked in legal battles over the Portable People Meter ratings system with the states of New Jersey and New York, which are seeking court orders to stop the rollout of the service.

The company also faces other concerns among radio broadcasters about the quality of its data and methodology.

Separately Tuesday, radio station owner Cumulus Media Inc. said it will begin using audience measurement and radio ratings services provided by Nielsen Co. instead of Arbitron in 50 small to mid-sized markets beginning in the third quarter of 2009. Arbitron uses its diary system to track listenership in those markets, just as Nielsen is planning to do.

Among other things, the Nielsen service will rely on "large samples to reduce relative error and bounce," the companies said in a press release. Cumulus Chief Executive Lew Dickey added that the company is making the switch after completing a search for a new measurement service "to improve the quality and value of radio ratings."

Clear Channel Radio will also subscribe to the Nielsen service in 17 of those markets.

Both companies subscribe to Arbitron's Portable People Meter radio ratings service in larger markets. Clear Channel will have to negotiate for Arbitron's diary ratings in smaller markets not covered by the Nielsen service.

NOVEMBER 19, 2008
Wall Street Journal
FCC Member Adds Pressure On Arbitron
A Democratic Federal Communications Commission member called Tuesday for the agency to launch a formal investigation of Arbitron Inc.'s new electronic radio-ratings system, raising the odds that the agency will look into the matter this year or early next year.
An FCC investigation would add significant pressure on Arbitron, which is already being investigated by the attorneys general in New York and New Jersey about the ratings system.
Minority broadcasters and interest groups say Arbitron's Portable People Meter system significantly undercounts minority listenership.
Jonathan Adelstein, a Democratic FCC commissioner, asked current FCC Chairman Kevin Martin to open a formal investigation into the Arbitron system. "We have heard from numerous broadcasters and advocates for diversity that the continued deployment of [Arbitron's new system] in new markets without accreditation from Media Ratings Council constitutes a clear and present danger to media diversity," Mr. Adelstein wrote in a letter released Tuesday afternoon.

A spokeswoman for Mr. Martin said he had no comment on the request.
"Arbitron does not believe that the FCC has jurisdiction over the company," a company spokesman said. The commission "lacks the authority to launch an investigation."
Arbitron says it developed the new system in consultation with the radio industry and the ratings-measurement company delayed rolling out the system in nine markets to address concerns.

2008-12-13

Republican Party of Virginia questioned by Black Republicans!

Richmond Free Press December 11-13, 2008 A9

Letters to the Editor

I know first-hand: State GOP racist


What do the Republican Party of Virginia (RPV) and black people have in common?
Absolutely nothing! Having served as the first and only African-American to be
Elected as national committeeman for the Young Republican s Federation of Virginia in the early 1990s, I have spent almost 20 years trying to educate state party leaders about how to get more black people involved, but to no avail. White Republicans too often think they know more about the black community than black people themselves. Their approach has always been to tell the black community what should be important to them versus asking what is important to us.

In all my years of involvement with the RPV, there never has been a black person in a position of power — with hiring or budget authority. I was much too young for the civil rights movement, but attending RPV meetings and functions gave me an idea of what it must have been like during that time. It was a mostly old white-male event circa the 1950s. It was so conservative that it was scary.

In case the RPV didn’t notice, the Democrats carried the state and added a new U.S senator during November’s election. White conservative voters are a shrinking part of the electorate. Republicans can get 100 percent of the conservative white vote, but that isn’t enough to win statewide or nationwide. So, what is the RPV’s plan to build a coalition that will make it competitive? Move further to the right!

So, let me make sure I understand this strategy. The party just lost the state to a Democratic presidential candidate for the first time since 1964 and the state has changed from red to blue. Further, the Republicans just lost the other U.S. senate seat to a Democrat, lost control of the state Senate and have a seven-seat lead in the House of Delegates. Yet, they want to move even further to the right. This illogical thinking is what is driving people like me and others away from this party in droves.


What should the party do? The first thing Republicans should do is to get rid of the state GOP chairman, Jeff Frederick. During the campaign, he compared Barack Obama to Osama bin Laden, saying, “They both have friends that bombed the Pentagon.” This, of course, is not true. Mr. Frederick has yet to apologize for his ignorant remarks. What is more surprising is that Mr. Frederick is only 33, an elected state legislator and of Latino descent. Not one person in leadership from RPV called him to task on this insidious comment. This is why I have ceased any involvement with the RPV. If I want to “pal around” with racists, I should have to go to a KKK meeting, not a RPV meeting. I know the RPV will trot out a black person or two to attempt to refute my position. But can the RPV explain the lack of any black people in significant positions on its headquarters staff? Can the RPV explain the lack of black people on the staffs of GOP delegates and senators?

As long as the RPV continues to inject race into its campaigns, requires conservative litmus tests for participation and ignores the changing demographics
of the state, the RPV leadership is destined to continue losing seats and elections.

The country and Virginia will continue to get less white. The RPV is not prepared to accept this reality. Its future is to cling to its past.

RAYNARD JACKSON
Arlington

2008-12-06

Tina Turner is the Queen!!!




Tina Turner "Live" in Kansas City (picture by Reuters' Andrew Macpherson)


There have been rumblings from the Aretha Franklin camp that Tina Turner is not the Queen of "Rock and Roll". I disagree. While I have been an Rhythm and Blues/Soul fanatic since pre-birth, and unquestionably, I consider Aretha Franklin "the Queen of Soul", followed closely by Chaka Khan, Gladys Knight, Whitney Houston, Phyllis Hyman, and Minnie Riperton, all of whom I will put up against any other six female vocalist on earth, no matter what genre. Seeing Aretha Franklin at the Rose Bowl in Pasadena in the 80's was incredible. I danced like crazy while my cousins and friends, looked at me in amazement. Aretha rocked the Rose Bowl.

Tina Turner and dancers at Madison Square Garden 12/1/08 (picture by Kirk Tanter)

Rock and Roll though is not Soul nor R/B. Rock and Roll with its' genesis in Little Richard, inspired by a pioneering rocker before rock was given a name, Louis Jordan. The song "Caldonia...Caldonia....What makes your big head so hard" was just one fired up hooks from many upbeat rockers by Louis Jordan in the 40's. Louis Jordan dominated the Billboard charts with hit after hit. To make a long story short, Rock and Roll has evolved from Little Richard into a lead guitar, head banging drums, and screaming lead singers that has frankly nothing to do with R/B nor Soul music. Rock and Roll has its' own radio format dominated by mostly White Male and Female shouters and groups. None of my favorite six female singers in the aforementioned paragraph would see the light of day on today's current or classic Rock and Roll radio stations. Yes Dick Clark admits soul, hip hop, disco, and R/B acts into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame in Cleveland, Ohio. But never are these genres of music considered Rock and Roll. But you will hear Little Richard, Chuck Berry, and Tina Turner on the Classic "Rock and Roll" radio stations. Are we clear here? I will stop here with the definition sgment, R/B and Rock n Roll are different with a seperate audience. I will state though, that Aretha Franklin is the undisputed Queen of Soul, and that Tina Turner is the undisputed Queen of Rock n Roll. Fair enough?


Tina Turner in control at Madison Square Garden (picture by Kirk Tanter)

Tina Turner proved to me long ago that she was the Queen of Rock n Roll. After seeing her "live" for the very first time last Monday December 1st, 2008 at Madison Square Garden in New York, I am totally convinced. I will tell Aretha Franklin to her smooth beautiful face and anyone else that Tina Turner is the best female artist that Rock n Roll has ever produced in its six decade history. What made the night so unique and enjoyable, was that ninety percent of the audience were "baby-boomers" in their fifties and sixties. Imagine being part of a crowd of fifty and sixty year old "rock n rollers" screaming, jumping, dancing, and singing Tina Turner songs throughout the night. I happen to be sitting in front of a lady in her late 50's along with four of her girlfriends that broadcast to the world that they were drinking gin and tonic that they snuck into the "Garden". And all of them had New York accents. They refused to shut up all night and partied all night long.

Tina Turner, now 69 years old, did not disappoint anyone that night at the "Garden". If you saw her concert on television during her prime 'solo' days in the 80's and 90's, where her shows are staged with hydraulic lifts suspending Tina Turner twenty feet in the air both on the stage and suspended over the crowd, then you were totally satisfied, as the lifts were present. Tina performed the theme song from the James Bond movie "Golden Eye" where she re-entered the stage stepping through a coiled "Golden Eye" that opened up to thunderous crowd roar, as Tina Turner re-entered the "upper" stage with different attire. Yes there were two stage levels. The upper stage were mostly occupied by four youthful lady "Go-Go" dancers, whom danced in unison for the most of Tina's songs. Tina also had a special re-entry for her "Thunderdome" performance, which was the theme from one of the "Mad Max" film series. The "Thunderdome" outfit was complete with the glistening split dress with ruffled shoulders pads, high hair with headban, high heels (of course), and a fierce Tina Turner look, pictured below.

Tina performs "Thurderdome" (picture by WENN)

The show luminated with fiery flames and cannons blasting off. A greater-than-life show and loud rock and roll music. I have always said, and firmly believe that based on the grooming and artist development mandate that record companies used to do in the pre-80's era, the concert performances of the artists of the 60's and 70's, more often than not, are better than the artists that came up in the post-80's era. The Tina Turner 2008 show was no-exception. The three-hour performance was flawless. And the loud and rumbustious ladies that sat behind me repeatedly could not believe how Tina Turner's legs and body can look as good and fit as a 25-year old young lady. Did I mention that Tina Turner is 69 years old? Well she is. And while the "Go-Go" dancers (pictured right) clearly were more active and energetic than Tina for most of the night, during Tina Turner's version of "Proud Mary", the youthful 20-something "Go-Go" girls (picturee right) could not keep up with Tina. As "Proud Mary" jammed during the finale of the Tina Turner revue, both the "Garden" crowd and Tina Turner were fired up and ready to go paaaarty! The Baby-Boomer crowd simply forgot that they were at, or near retirement, that they were suppose to be cool, calm, and collectivly sitting down and applauding. I believe that this elderly "Baby-Boomer" generation -- including Tina Turner -- are refining what middle-age and seniors means. The social stratosphere changed more than we thought in the revolutionary 1960's. Baby-boomers had hands high in the air clapping away. They were dancing, shaking, hollering, whistling, and outright screaming throughout the "Garden". It was a sight to behold. Even a 69-year old Tina Turner showed out on sheer adrenalin along with this awe-inspiring Madison Square Garden crowd. During Tina Turner's version of "Proud Mary", at the point where the twenty-something "Go-Go" girls shake their stuff to a high energy instrumental, Tina joined in and these four fit "Go-Go" girls could not keep up with the 69-year old Queen of Rock n Roll at this fanatic point. Tina seemed to even coach the 21st century "Go-Go" Girls to do the "swim" -- a 60's dance Tina made famous -- along with rhythmic booty-shakin, and the hair flying herky-jerky gyrations that we are accustom to seeing during the "Proud Mary" performance. Tina Turner was in that same rare form we say in the early 70's. However I have to say that the new "Go-Go" girls could not shake a stick at the "Go-Go" Girls back in the day with the Ike and Tina Turner review. If you have not witnessed the Tina's original "Go-Go Girls" here is a taste of them from YouTube below.



After the stelar perfomance of "Proud Mary", Tina Turner, the enthusiastic Band (included Euge Groove as lead saxophonist), and the "Go-Go" dancers were all drenched in sweat. The performers all bowed, waved to the crowd, and then left the stage for their well-deserved encore cheers. I am sure backstage they all fell out. The Madison Square Garden crowd cheered and shouted uncontrollably demanding an encore! And, as true a performer as Tina Turner is, she ablidged. Not only did Tina Turner perform an encore performance, but the hydraulic lift was dispatched for a performance of Tina's early 70's solo hit "Nutbush City Limits". The hydraulic lift took Tina Turner 20 feet in the air and out about 20 rolls out over the now crazed New York party crowd. Even Tom Cruise was in high spirits beneath the white hydraulic lift. Tina danced, shook, and even bent her body half-way over the lift's banister (pictured left).

While it was a wild enthusiastic show, during the mid-point of the show after intermission, Tina Turner sat down with her background singers and a few acoustic guitarists, and sang a few ballads that included her slower version of the Beatles "Help", a Blues tune, and then got the party back started with the Rolling Stones "Jumping Jack Flash". Her Grammy award winning hit "What's Love Got to do with it" was, of course, well-received. Tina Turner's hit song "Simply the Best" was the performance that permanently ignited the crowd -- never to return to mere mortals -- played about the fifth song in a 20-song spectacular performance.

I thought, one, seeing the concert at Madison Square Garden in New York would assure a masterful performance by Tina Turner -- and I was right -- and, two, I had never seen Tina Turner perform "Live". The videos of her solo "Live" concerts, and as lead singer for the Ike and Tina Turner in the 60's/70's are simply mesmerizing. I would never thing of changing the channel to anything else. I had also made a promise myself following the death of the R/B multi-octave songstress Minnie Riperton, that I would never miss a performance by one of my favorite artists. I thoroughly regret not seeing Minnie Riperton before she died, and cried like a baby upon hearing the news of Minnie's passing. Minnie had just come back to record after years of dealing with Breast Cancer. Riperton did not reveal to the public that this was her final recording performance for the ages, as from what I understood the cancer spread to the point of inoperablablily. The lyrics in Minnie Riperton's return hit "Memory Lane", clearly stated that she was reminiscing her own life, and at the same time questioning God as to why her life must end so young in her 30's with two young kids and a good marriage. Though I did see singer Phyllis Hyman before she committed suicide, Phyllis had lyrics that were somewhat introspective in "Living All Alone" and "Living in Confusion" that in hindsight, Phyllis had unanswered questions. Phyllis Hyman's show was fantastic. And finally seeing Tina Turner was one of these moments that I treasure, and I encourage you all to see her show, even if you have to go to Europe to see it, as her tour goes there after her current North American tour. This may be Tina final tour for real this time. In fact, I read that Tina Turner was hospitalized the night before this Madison Square Garden concert with a fever and exhaustion. She was given oxygen and the whole nine. Read here from this link http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/sfgate/category?blogid=7&cat=2105. Tina Turner though said that she had to perform, discarding any discomfort. I think that Janet Jackson, Whitney Houston, and Sly Stone should take notes here, from the undisputed Queen of Rock and Roll: Tina Turner.




Tina Turner Concert Reviews:


Tina Turner waving good-bye to the enthusiastic Madison Square Garden crowd (picture by Kirk Tanter)