2018-11-30

Chiefs send Kareem Hunt home from practice facility after video shows him shoving, kicking woman at hotel in February 2018



Story by CBS Sports
Written by John Breech

Chiefs running back Kareem Hunt was reportedly sent home from the team's facility Friday after a video was released that showed him shoving and kicking a woman.

The video, which was obtained by TMZ, shows an incident that took place at a luxury hotel in Cleveland in February. At the beginning of the 79-second video, Hunt clearly shoves a woman. Near the end of the video, Hunt is also caught on film kicking the woman while she's on the ground. Hunt also appears to rush the woman, but he ended up hitting a man who was standing between Hunt and the woman. Hunt's charge caused both the man and the woman to fall to the ground.

The incident had been previously reported and addressed by the team during the offseason, but the video was made public for the first time Friday. After the video went public, the Chiefs decided to send Hunt home with ESPN reporting that the running back could end up on the commissioner's exempt list until the league can figure out how to handle the situation. If Hunt is placed on the commissioner's exempt list, he wouldn't be able to play during that time.

Video link: http://www.tmz.com/2018/11/30/kc-chiefs-kareem-hunt-attacked-kicked-woman-surveillance-video/

The Chiefs play at Oakland on Sunday.

As for the video, the entire incident took place in the early morning hours of Feb. 10. At the time, cops were called to the scene and a police report was made, but no charges were filed because Cleveland police viewed the incident as a cross complaint. Not only did the female call the cops on Hunt, but Hunt's friend also called police on her.

According to a police report obtained by Cleveland.com, the woman and her friend spent the night of Feb. 9 hanging on a party bus in Cleveland with Hunt and his friends. At some point in the night, everyone headed back to Hunt's place at The Metropolitan at the 9, where the incident took place.

One of Hunt's friends said that incident started after they found out that the woman, a student at Kent State, was only 19 years old. However, the woman disputed that fact and said that she was kicked out of Hunt's place because she "didn't want" one of the men.

After being kicked out, one of Hunt's friends said that the woman started using racial slurs. At that point, someone in Hunt's party apparently gave the woman and her friend $20 for a ride home, but the woman didn't want to leave. According to the police report, she stuck around for at least 30 more minutes and was yelling and pounding on the door to Hunt's apartment.

According to the police report, the physical altercation started when the woman hit one of Hunt's female friends in the face. At that point, Hunt came out of his apartment and "shoved and pushed" the woman, which is where the video picks up.

There were two police reports filed from the incident with one listing Hunt as a suspect and another that listed the woman as the suspect. Cleveland Police Sgt. Jennifer Ciaccia told Cleveland.com in February that since it was a cross complaint, no charges would be filed unless one of the two (Hunt or the woman) went to the prosecutor's office and asked to have charges pursued.

Hunt was asked about the incident back in August, but didn't have much to say.

"I've learned from it and I'm focused on football," Hunt said, via KansasCity.com. "Just be in the right place at the right time. I'm going to keep thinking about football and go out there and do my job."

Chiefs owner Clark Hunt also commented on the incident and said that his running back learned a lesson from it.

"Kareem is a young man, second year in the league, obviously had a very big year on the field last year," Clark Hunt said, via ESPN.com. "I'm sure he learned some lessons this offseason and hopefully won't be in those kind of situations in the future."

What The G20 Should Focus On: Right-Wing Nationalism - Op-Ed by Nida Khan

Commentary by Nida Khan

It’s that time again; the gathering of world leaders for the G20 summit. This year’s forum, held in Argentina on November 30th and December 1st, will focus on many things from the global economy, trade and transatlantic relations to a U.S./China showdown, various regional tensions and much more. But what will likely not appear on the agenda, in a bilateral meeting, nor in a sideline discussion, is one of the greatest challenges the world faces right now: the rise and consolidation of power of right-wing nationalists.

All across Europe, the United States and the west at large, there is a recurring theme where societies are becoming increasingly diverse and simultaneously there is a rise in xenophobia and hate crimes. It’s no coincidence that at the same time, there are significant gains that right-wing and nationalist parties/individuals have made globally and there is cause for great alarm. The question is, what are we going to do about it?

In Italy, the Five Star Movement and right-wing League recently formed a coalition government. Part of their program includes ‘mass deportations for undocumented migrants’, and Italy’s new Interior Minister has made outrageous statements like ‘we must stop being the refugee camp of Europe’. In Austria, the right-wing anti-immigrant conservative Freedom Party (which was formed in 1956 by a former officer in the SS by the way), won 26 percent of the vote last year — 26 percent.

The right-wing nationalist Alternative for Germany party won 12.6 percent of that nation’s most recent election. Like many other nationalist parties in Europe, their platform is heavily anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim with proposed policies that reflect those sentiments. Over in Hungary, the far-right won 19 percent of the vote in their last election, and strongman Victor Orban secured yet another term as Prime Minster. He has been a vocal opponent of Muslim migrants, warning of a Europe with a ‘mixed population and no sense of identity’.

From Denmark and Sweden to Finland and Switzerland (where the right-wing Swiss People’s Party won a whopping 29 percent in 2015), the move of these nationalist groups into the mainstream and into positions of power should keep everyone up at night. Over in Brazil, the recent election of Jair Bolsonaro marks another dangerous point in the rise of the global far right. The world’s fourth largest democracy now has a former paratrooper in power who embraces misogynist, racist and homophobic rhetoric/ideas to the point where the attorney general previously charged him with inciting hatred and discrimination against blacks, women, indigenous communities and the LGBTQ community.

Here in the United States, there’s no dancing around the fact that Donald Trump and his administration have emboldened racist, right-wing groups that were previously relegated to the outskirts of society. In addition, this administration and current federal government have enacted policies that back up their dangerous and divisive rhetoric like the Muslim ban, child separation at the border and more.

A Trump administration appointee to the State Department even disputed the idea that leaders have a duty to condemn hate speech and incitement, and he tore into standard UN documents that condemn racism as a threat to democracy according to CNN and others. The United States also withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council earlier this year. Many former and current members of the Trump administration from Steve Bannon and Sebastian Gorka to Stephen Miller and others have ties to troubling groups/individuals to say the least.

It’s no surprise that as the browning of America, Europe and elsewhere takes place, those that were on the fringes have found themselves front and center with greater power and a much greater megaphone. As this plays out, at the same time, minorities and marginalized groups within these countries are being further suppressed and attacks against them are on the rise across the board.

In the United States alone, hate crimes rose for the third straight year in a row according to the FBI’s own stats. In fact, 2017 saw a 17% increase, and hate crimes based on race, ethnicity or ancestry made up about 60 percent of the total. Of those that were race or ethnicity-based incidents, about half targeted African Americans. Religious-based hate crimes made up about 20 percent of incidents, with anti-Semitic attacks accounting for the majority, followed by Islamophobic attacks.

According to the latest numbers, hate crimes stemming from racial bias rose 18 percent, those based on religious animosity rose 23 percent and attacks against LGBTQ individuals rose about 5 percent. It’s important to note that the FBI’s stats are far below the reality on the ground as many police departments fail to participate in reporting on hate crimes, and many victims don’t report attacks for a variety of reasons including language barriers or inability to navigate the system.

All across the country (and the world), attacks are taking place with a regularity that is dangerously close to normalcy. Most of these incidents receive very little (if any) media coverage, many go unreported or under-reported, and often times there isn’t enough pressure/follow through on police to go after the perpetrators. These are the silent victims; the ones who don’t receive breaking news chyrons, the ones whose names aren’t trending on Twitter or Facebook, the ones whose terrifying ordeal most people will never even know.

Back in May, the Center for the Study of Hate and Extremism at California State University at San Bernardino released a report that contained this glaring stat: hate crimes in the nation’s 10 largest cities increased by 12 percent last year. It was the highest level in more than a decade. In fact, hate crimes in the biggest cities have increased for the past four years even as the overall crime rate has decreased for decades now.

Across the pond, the number of recorded hate crimes for England has more than doubled in the last five years according to the Home Office’s annual report. More than three quarters of those were racially motivated. Religious hate crimes surged by 40 percent, with 52 percent of those crimes targeting Muslims. In Italy, hate crimes motivated by racial or religious bias rose more than tenfold from 2012 to 2016 according to police stats. Over in Germany — yes Germany — there were an average of four anti-Semitic attacks per day in 2017 according to a police report, and around 950 attacks on Muslims in the same year according to government figures. This is truly frightening.

When people like Donald Trump ran for office on a platform stoking fears of immigrants, Muslims and ‘others’, it wasn’t by accident. Somehow much of the media, politicians and punditry class deemed him a joke, and treated him as such without realizing how much of his messaging and ideas resonated with a significant segment of the population. And in their effort to represent ‘both sides’, they actually ended up giving him the largest platform ever and normalized him to a level that can never be reversed. It is the same dynamic we are seeing play out in many other places.

In their desire to placate to nationalists and the right-wing, many leaders have already begun changing their stance on key issues like immigration. German Chancellor Angela Merkel recently delivered a speech where she said that the humanitarian exception of 2015 would not be repeated, while the French National Assembly passed a tough new immigration law earlier this year that tightens rules around asylum — it was supported by President Emmanuel Macron.

As world leaders gather once again for G20, there is no shortage of global challenges to tackle. For the many minority and disenfranchised communities in places like Europe, Russia, the United States, Israel, Brazil and elsewhere, the dangers of an increasing rise of right-wing nationalism is a reality they cannot ignore. For all people that yearn to coexist and live in peaceful harmony, it is something that we must collectively push back against. Ignoring the problem isn’t the answer, and neither is trying to appease their supporters. To cite an infamous
talking point of the right: if you can’t name the problem, then you can’t solve it.

It’s time for world leaders to name right-wing nationalism what it is — an existential threat to us all.
_______________________________________________________________________________

Nida Khan
Independent journalist/analyst.
Bylines include: Huffpost, U.S. News & World Report, Essence Magazine, NY Daily News, CNN & more. Open Line Online 107.5 WBLS NY

2018-11-28

Here's the buyout GM offered before announcing 14,000 job cuts

* Before its layoff announcement, GM had offered voluntary buyouts to 17,700 employees, citing stiff competition and a tough economy.

** About 2,250 workers took buyouts; the company was aiming for 8,000 "voluntary" separations.

*** GM announced 14,000 job cuts this week.
___________________________________________

Story by CNBC
Written by Tyler Clifford

General Motors executives painted a bleak outlook of the global economy in offering buyouts to 17,700 employees last month.

"We must take significant action and now while our company and the economy are strong," they said in talking points given to managers in October to discuss the severance plan with staff. CNBC obtained the "leader talking points," and GM verified their authenticity.

An "intensely competitive" industry combined with pressure from rising commodities prices, interest rates and a difficult trade environment created a sense of urgency. "We need ... to make the right pre-emptive moves so that we come out of this tough time ahead," they said in the talking points.

The Detroit automaker on Monday announced plans to halt production at five factories in North America and cut about 14,000 jobs in the company's most significant restructuring since its bankruptcy in 2009. The news falls on the heels of an otherwise strong quarter. Its third-quarter earnings released Oct. 31 — the same day GM started soliciting the buyouts — showed its first year-over-year earnings growth since the first quarter of 2017 and sent the stock soaring 9 percent.

'Not an option'

But executives saw stiff competition and a tough economy ahead. The cuts are designed to free up some cash and position its workforce of 180,000 for the future of autonomous vehicles and electric cars.

"We cannot afford to wait and see what happens in the industry, or with China, or in international trade or currency, to then react," the severance document said. "Even if macro-economic factors are partially to blame, continuing to lower guidance to Wall Street is not an option."

GM offered voluntary buyouts to roughly 17,700 eligible employees in North America with at least 12 years of service, according to the document. The company was aiming for 8,000 voluntary buyouts among its salaried workers as part of a total headcount reduction of 14,000, spokesman Pat Morrissey confirmed. He said about 2,250 workers accepted severance agreements by the Nov. 19 deadline.

The carmaker previously said that involuntary layoffs would follow if there were not enough takers. Roughly 5,750 salaried workers and 6,000 hourly employees will be laid off, he confirmed. Half of the hourly workers are in Canada with the other half in the U.S., where the company will work with union officials to try to move to other plants, Morrissey said.

Salary and benefits

GM is allowing some employees who took the buyouts to leave as early as this coming Saturday with an official last day of Jan. 31 and salary and benefits continuing for six months after that. Executives could also leave in December with an effective last day of Feb. 28 and a full year of salary and benefits, according to the severance materials.

GM warned this summer that the trade war instigated by President Donald Trump could force job cuts in the United States. Trump was irate with GM's announcement this week, tweeting on Tuesday that he was "very disappointed" with the company and CEO Mary Barra for idling plants in Ohio, Michigan and Maryland.

"Nothing being closed in Mexico & China. The U.S. saved General Motors, and this is the THANKS we get," Trump tweeted. He also threatened to cut all of the company's federal subsidies, following up on Wednesday with the announcement that the administration was studying all tariffs on cars imported to the U.S. because of the "G.M. event."

GM says the move would help to save $6 billion a year. Shares of the company jumped 4.8 percent on the announcement Monday, but Trump's tweets drove the stock down Tuesday and Wednesday. Its shares have fallen by almost 20 percent during the last year.

"A strong cash position is the only way the company can deal with these factors and also continue to invest in growth opportunities and to set ourselves up for the future," the talking points said.

"The leadership team is very focused on improving our cash generation and profit performance on each of our vehicles."

— CNBC's Robert Ferris contributed to this article.

Democrats overwhelmingly nominate Pelosi as Speaker amid rebellion



Story by The Hill
Written by Mike Lillis

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) claimed victory on Wednesday, saying she had won the Democratic nomination for Speaker amid an entrenched rebellion from insurgent lawmakers who pose the starkest threat to her long reign atop the party.

The outcome was no surprise. Pelosi was running uncontested and enjoys widespread support within the liberal-heavy caucus she’s led since 2003.

The much higher bar will come in the first week of January, when the full House meets to choose the Speaker in a public vote requiring a majority of the entire voting chamber. It’s there that the insurgents feel they can block Pelosi’s ascension, even as Pelosi and her allies have projected nothing but confidence that she’ll retake the gavel she lost following the red wave elections of 2010.

Wednesday’s Speaker vote was conducted by private ballot in the Visitors Center of the Capitol. It was reflective of the unusual nature of this year’s leadership elections that there were written ballots at all.

Pelosi was running unchallenged for the Speaker nomination, and typically such races are decided by unanimous consent. This year, though, the clamor for casting a protest vote — particularly from incoming freshman who had promised voters to oppose Pelosi — was loud enough that party leaders offered paper ballots with a simple “yes/no” option on the question of whether Pelosi should be Speaker.


Nancy Pelosi just nominated as Speaker of the House (photo by Greg Nash)

Indeed, Pelosi herself had given lawmakers the green-light to vote against her in the closed ballot, with the idea that it may liberate them to vote “present” in the Jan. 3 floor vote, according to a Democratic lawmaker familiar with the discussions.

“Pelosi has released some members to vote no in caucus and then vote present on the House floor,” the lawmaker said Wednesday morning, before the voting began.

Rep. Kathleen Rice (D-N.Y) said that rebel members met with Pelosi before the vote in an effort "to engage her in a reasonable conversation about leadership transition," but were rejected.

"Unfortunately, our concerns were dismissed outright," she said in a statement.

Lawmakers cast their ballots just after a deal was announced between Pelosi and the Problem Solvers Caucus on changes to rules aimed at empowering rank-and-file lawmakers and breaking partisan gridlock.

Nine Democrats in the bipartisan, 48-member caucus had vowed to withhold their support for Pelosi — or any other Speaker nominee — unless the candidate commits, in writing, to the changes.

In the closed-door meeting, Pelosi was officially nominated by Rep. Joseph Kennedy (D-Mass.). A number of other Democrats then addressed the caucus to voice their support for the longtime leader, a list that included Reps. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) and John Lewis (D-Ga.), as well as Reps.-elect Angie Craig (Minn.) and Veronica Escobar (Texas).

Also in the room during Wednesday's vote was Pelosi's husband, Paul, who arrived separately.

Rep. Brian Higgins (D-N.Y.), who endorsed Pelosi last week after initially signing a letter opposing her, said it was positive for Democrats to have a public debate about what direction their party should go -- and who should lead it.

"Democracy is a sloppy mess. ... There are a lot of differing views, even within the Democratic Caucus. The ability to pull that together is not clean and efficient all the time, and everyone has laid on the table what they are looking for," Higgins told reporters. "Everyone here, 435 members in the House, has one legislative tool and that is their vote."

2018-11-26

How performing the song ‘Strange Fruit’ killed American Jazz Singer Billie "Lady Day" Holiday


Song: "Strange Fruit" performed just four(4) months before the weakened, targeted 44-year old Billie Holiday's death

Story by The Progressive
Written by Brandon Weber

“Strange Fruit” may have been written by American song-writer and poet Abel Meeropol (a.k.a. Lewis Allen), but ever since Billie Holiday sang the three brief stanzas to music in 1937, she’s owned it.

Holiday, born Eleanora Fagan, said she always thought of her father when she sang “Strange Fruit.” He died at age thirty-nine after being denied medical treatment at a Texas “whites only” hospital. Because of that memory, Holiday was reluctant to perform the song, but did so anyway to tell people about the reality of life as a Black Man in America.

“It reminds me of how Pop died,” she wrote in her autobiography. “But I have to keep singing it, not only because people ask for it, but because twenty years after Pop died, the things that killed him are still happening in the South.”

The song was so poignant for Holiday that she laid down some rules when she sang it at her gigs: She would close the evening with the song; the waiters would stop service when she began; and the room would be in total darkness except for a spotlight on her face. There would be no encore.

“Lady Day,” as Holiday was called by many at the time, began to work the song into her repertoire sixteen years before Rosa Parks refused to give up her seat on the bus in Montgomery, Alabama. Jazz writer Leonard Feather referred to the song as “the first significant protest in words and music, the first significant cry against racism.”

The song’s lyrics were shocking to some members of Holiday’s mostly white audiences:

Southern trees bear strange fruit
Blood on the leaves and blood at the root
Black bodies swinging in the southern breeze
Strange fruit hanging from the poplar trees

_______________________________________________________

At times, her performance of the song was met with fierce pushback.Though many people knew that lynchings of African-Americans in the South were common, there was resistance to ending the practice among Southern whites. Racism, combined with a popular desire to limit federal power over local concerns,kept people in the North from making any successful moves to end lynchings in the South.

In the end, Billie Holiday’s insistence on performing “Strange Fruit” may have been responsible for her demise.


Song: "Good Morning Heartache"

One of the primary attempts to silence her came from a man named Harry Anslinger, the first commissioner for the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, and an extreme racist, even for the 1930s. As Johann Hari details in Chasing the Scream: The First and Last Days of the War on Drugs, Anslinger claimed that narcotics made black people forget their place in the fabric of American society, and that jazz musicians were dangerous in particular, creating “Satanic” music under the influence of marijuana.

Holiday, who throughout her career called public attention to the devastating impact of white supremacy, was also a drug user. She drew Anslinger’s notice, and he ordered Holiday to cease performing the song. Holiday refused, and Anslinger ramped up his efforts to silence her.

After one of Anslinger’s men was paid to track Holiday and frame her with buying and using heroin, she spent eighteen months in prison. Upon her release in 1948, the federal government refused to renew her cabaret performer’s license, mandatory for any performer playing or singing at any club or bar serving alcohol.

This utterly undermined her career. Although Holiday was able to perform multiple sold-out Carnegie Hall performances over the next several years, she could no longer travel the nightclub circuit.


Song: Aint nobody's business if I do

Unable to perform regularly at the venues she loved, and to stop remembering a childhood that included being raped at age ten, and working in a brothel with her mother, Holiday eventually began using heroin again. When she checked into a New York hospital in 1959, her liver was failing and cancerous. She was emaciated, and her heart and lungs were compromised. Despite her condition, she didn’t want to stay there. “They’re going to kill me. They’re going to kill me in there. Don’t let them,” she presciently told friends and family.


Song: Lover, Come Back To Me

Indeed, Anslinger’s men, sensing a macabre opportunity, showed up at her hospital bedside, handcuffed her to the bed, took mugshots, removed gifts that people had brought to the room—flowers, radio, record player, chocolates, magazines—and stationed two cops at the door.

Even so, as doctors began methadone treatment, Holiday began to improve, gaining some weight and improving slowly. But then Anslinger’s men prevented hospital staff from administering any further methadone. She succumbed to death within days.



Song: "Strange Fruit"
___________________________
Read more:

https://youtu.be/Web007rzSOI

https://www.allmusic.com/artist/billie-holiday-mn0000079016

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Billie_Holiday

http://www.billieholiday.com

https://progressive.org/dispatches/strange-fruit-caused-the-murder-of-billie-holiday-180220/?fbclid=IwAR30muwmygDp2SvahJ1octK5zc_rqfGxIfTvlscD8aWev6PeoI7QzXY2CLI#.W_MGMsoPKn8.facebook

United States NBA's Washington Wizards ready to trade its' Top Players


No Washington Wizards player exempt from possible trade talks

Story by ESPN
Written by Adrian Wojnarowski

Video Link: http://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/25320702/washington-wizards-john-wall-bradley-beal-available-trade-scenarios

As the Washington Wizards' season spirals, the franchise is making every player on its roster -- including All-Star guards John Wall and Bradley Beal -- available to discuss in trade scenarios, league sources told ESPN on today.

Washington's preference remains to reshape the team around Wall and Beal, but poor play among key teammates is limiting their trade value and paralyzing the Wizards' efforts to make meaningful changes to a roster that no longer appears functional together, league sources said.

The Wizards (5-11) have resisted involving Wall or Beal in previous trade talks, including discussions that they held for the league's past two available stars, Kawhi Leonard and Jimmy Butler, league sources said. While Washington hasn't shopped its All-Star backcourt, it is rapidly becoming apparent to the organization that it needs to start considering overtures for them.

Washington had hopes that forwards Otto Porter and Kelly Oubre could be centerpieces of deals that could return an impactful third star, but those players have fetched minimal interest on the market. Porter has a massive contract on the books, including three years and $81 million left.

Coach Scott Brooks was fierce in his criticism of the Wizards after back-to-back home losses to Brooklyn and Portland over the weekend.

"We got to just play with more enthusiasm, more effort, more energy," Brooks told reporters on Sunday night. "It's embarrassing."

The Wizards are just two games ahead of last-place Atlanta in the Southeast Division.

Beal, 25, could turn out to be the guard with the most value on the trade market, with his 3-point shooting ability and a more manageable contract, and being three years younger than Wall.

Wall's contract extension starts in 2019-20 and will average $42 million annually for four years. What further complicates moving Wall is the inclusion of a 15 percent trade kicker in his deal. Wall is a five-time All-Star who has been a favorite of ownership.

2018-11-23

A real deal on Black Friday by the NAACP



Friend—

This Black Friday, I can’t offer you 40% off or buy one, get one free.

What I can offer you is the chance to help lead the charge to make sure every American gets a fair deal when it comes to equality and opportunity.

I can offer you the chance to take a stand and be a part of a history-making movement by joining the NAACP today, if you’re not already a member.

In the current civil rights climate in America, there are those who want to keep moving forward in making our democracy one that works for all people, and those who want to push us back to the days of Jim Crow.

Recently, we’ve seen a dramatic rise in discriminatory policies that threaten the civil rights advancements won by generations of freedom fighters. Racist and hate-filled rhetoric is becoming the new normal.

As the nation’s foremost civil rights organization, the NAACP remains uniquely positioned to lead the national discourse on combating the spread of the politics of hate and fight back against policies and practices that harm marginalized communities. By becoming an NAACP member today, you can help to widen the reach of our efforts.

Stand firmly in the company of others who are fighting for justice and equality at this critical time.

Join the NAACP now and mobilize your friends and family to do the same. https://naacp.org/become-a-member/

Fighting Forward,

Derrick Johnson
@DerrickNAACP
President and CEO
NAACP

2018-11-18

$1 an Hour to Fight Largest Fire in CA History: Are Prison Firefighting Programs Slave Labor?




Story by Democracy Now

California relies on thousands of prisoners, including many women, to battle the wildfires burning statewide. Prisoner firefighters gain training and earn time off of their sentences for good behavior, typically two days off for each day served.

But critics of the program say the state is exploiting prisoners’ eagerness to earn time for early release.

While salaried firefighters earn an annual mean wage of $74,000 plus benefits, inmates earn just $2 per day with an additional $1 per hour when fighting an active fire.

According to some estimates, California avoids spending about $80-$100 million a year by using prison labor to fight its biggest environmental problem.

For more, Democracy Now in above video speaks with Romarilyn Ralston, a member of the California Coalition for Women Prisoners, L.A. chapter, and the program coordinator for Project Rebound at Cal State University, Fullerton. Ralston was imprisoned for 23 years, during which time she worked as a fire camp trainer. They also speak with Deirdre Wilson, who was imprisoned for three-and-a-half years and worked as a landscaper at a women’s fire camp in San Diego.

Obama Foundation planted and investing

Story by Obama.org

Today marks an important milestone in the history of the Obama Foundation. For the past year, we've been working around the clock and around the world to help a new class of leaders change history.

In Johannesburg, we brought together the future of a continent, connecting leaders from Algeria to Zambia so they can achieve more together than they can alone.

In cities around the world, we've identified Scholars and Fellows who have already made their mark on the world and we're investing in them to make an even bigger impact.

In countries throughout the developing world, we're supporting grassroots leaders who are working to ensure that adolescent girls have access to education and the opportunity to achieve their full potential—something we all know Michelle cares about deeply.

In communities across America, are investing in organizations that are breaking down the barriers that our boys and young men of color face.

In cities like Phoenix and Columbia, we've launched programs that seek to empower and train young leaders to create the world they want to see.

And here in Chicago, we are working hand-in-hand with our neighbors to ensure the Obama Presidential Center serves as an economic engine for the South Side and a source of hope for kids around the world and around the city.

For the first time, we're bringing all of these folks together for the second Obama Foundation Summit.

And you're invited to tune in: Go ahead and bookmark this link and we'll start our livestream of the Summit tonight at 5:30PM CST.

Link: https://www.obama.org/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=obamafound&utm_content=5+-+You+can+watch+that+conversation+and+ever&utm_campaign=20181118_summit_p44_preview_monthly&source=20181118_summit_p44_preview_monthly

2018-11-13

NFL moves Chiefs-Rams game from Mexico City to Los Angeles due to poor field conditions

Story by CBS Sports
Written by Sean Wagner-McGough

The Chiefs and Rams will no longer meet in Mexico City. Due to concerns over the field conditions in Mexico City, the NFL has moved Monday night's game -- arguably the best game of the season -- from Estadio Azteca in Mexico City to the Coliseum in Los Angeles.

In a statement, the league announced that the decision was made "in consultation with the NFLPA" after an inspection found that the field "does not meet NFL standards for playability and consistency and will not meet those standards by next Monday."

"We have worked extensively with our partners at Estadio Azteca for months in preparation for this game," said NFL Executive Vice President of International Mark Waller. "Until very recently, we had no major concerns. But, the combination of a difficult rainy season and a heavy multi-event calendar of events at the stadium, have resulted in significant damage to the field that presents unnecessary risks to player safety and makes it unsuitable to host an NFL game. As a result, we have determined that moving the game is the right decision, and one that we needed to announce now in order to allow our teams and fans to make alternate arrangements."

The decision to move the game came after ESPN's Adam Schefter reported earlier on Tuesday that players on both teams were strong considering sitting out the game if it was played in Mexico City. The photos that have emerged over the past few days make it easy to understand why players didn't want to set foot on the field and why the NFL chose to relocate an important international game between two Super Bowl contenders.

This does not look like an NFL field:

There are still some logistics to sort out. Ticket holders will need to be reimbursed. As the NFL's release noted, the Rams will now need to announce ticket information as soon as possible. The Rams players are currently in Colorado, where they were preparing for Mexico City's altitude. According to ESPN's Lindsey Thiry, the earliest the Rams will return is Saturday.

Even if the logistics are messy, this was a no-brainer decision for the NFL. The league couldn't really afford to put its players at such an obvious risk by playing on an unplayable field. If the NFL hadn't moved the game back to L.A., it would've faced the possibility of seeing players on both sides refuse to partake in the game, which would've turned the game of the year into an embarrassing debacle. This really was the only logical choice the league had.

Now, the game of the year will be played on an NFL-caliber field, the Rams won't lose a home game to the international series, and nobody has to worry about getting hurt on a dangerous surface.

2018-11-12

Democratic Candidate for Governor Andrew Gillum "Retracts" Concession Speech - The Re-Count begins -


Florida Begins Vote Recounts in Senate and Governor’s Races

Mark Davis backs Jon Gruden, tries to explain the Mack trade and wants the Raiders to play in Oakland next year


New Coach for the Oakland Raiders, Jon Gruden

Story by The Athletic
Written by Vic Tafur

Mark Davis was never going to blame Jon Gruden nine months after the Raiders owner gave him a 10-year blank check to coach his team. And after declining interview requests from The Athletic for months, Davis told ESPN on Sunday night that he and general manager Reggie McKenzie have “got to look in the mirror and figure out, where the hell did we go wrong in trying to build this thing?”

The Raiders are 1-8 after Sunday’s 20-6 loss to the Chargers and have not scored a touchdown in the last nine quarters. The fans booed often throughout the second half and Davis said that hits him in the heart.

“I feel so bad for the fans because they want to win,” Davis told ESPN. “Everybody in this organization is built around winning. We don’t have the tools right now to do it and it’s nobody’s fault but our own and when it comes down to it, it’s my fault …

“Where this team is right now is my fault. We haven’t been able...

2018-11-10

Analysis: The question now facing Democrats: How to wake up the 'too woke to vote' crowd


Concession speech by Mayor Andrew Gillum. Gillum ran for Governor of Florida

Story by CNN
Written by John Blake

If you talk politics in the black community, you've probably run across this character:

The "too woke to vote" nonvoter.

They follow elections. They hate racism. They talk all day about "The Man" oppressing their people.

They're just too hip to vote because they think America is too irredeemably racist for voting to make a difference.

They are gripped by what one writer calls "the highest level of woke-osity."

After Tuesday's midterms -- when one black candidate for governor narrowly lost in Florida and another trailed in a Georgia race still too close to call -- I wondered what those "too woke to vote" were telling their voting friends and families now.

It's not a trivial question. How those conversations go could affect what happens in the 2020 presidential election.

If Democrats hope to take back the White House in two years, they will have to do better than mobilize people who don't normally vote in the midterms. Florida -- and maybe Georgia -- shows that won't be enough.

They will have to mobilize people who don't normally vote at all.

And that means waking up the "too woke to vote" crowd.

There was a lot of hope riding on the candidacies of Andrew Gillum and Stacey Abrams. Gillum lost his bid to become the first black governor of Florida, a crucial swing state. And Abrams is trying to become the country's first black female governor. Though she has yet to concede, her opponent, Republican Brian Kemp, has declared victory.

Both Gillum and Abrams attracted the support of former President Barack Obama and black celebrities. Both had to contend with opponents who employed tactics that seemed, at least to some, straight out of the Jim Crow playbook, including racist rhetoric and the use of a term that once seemed relegated to the history books: complaints of "outside agitators." There were also allegations of voter suppression.

But Abrams' and Gillum's supporters hoped they could overcome those obstacles by turning out voters who don't normally vote in midterm elections.

It wasn't enough in Florida, and it may not have been enough in Georgia -- in part because Republicans did the same, and perhaps even better.

President Trump matched the enthusiasm of progressive voters in those states by mobilizing his white, rural base with promises to protect them from, as Peter Beinhart wrote in The Atlantic,

"Latino murderers and women who destroy men's lives by alleging sexual assault.

"The harsh truth is this: Racism often works," Beinhart said. "Cross-racial coalitions for economic justice are the exception in American history. Mobilizing white people to protect their racial dominance is the norm. The lesson of 2018 is that American politics is not reverting to 'normal.' In many ways, Trumpism is normal.''


Whether Democrats can get those "too woke to vote" to the polls will be crucial to the party's success.

This issue isn't abstract to me.

One of my best friends in Atlanta is "too woke to vote." He studies black history, loves the Black Panthers, talks constantly about racism. But he won't vote.

Just two weeks ago, we had an impassioned argument about the importance of voting. I told him I didn't care who he voted for; just vote.

The discussion got so heated that he stepped away from me as I raised my voice. We changed the subject to safer ground: sports and women.

It made me think about what writer and poet Michael Harriot said in a 2017 essay in The Root:

"You can't have an intelligent conversation with someone with a Ph.D. in wokeology because, when losing an argument, they can always counter actual facts with: 'Who told you that? The white man?'"

Still, after Tuesday, I wanted to know what my "too woke to vote" friend thought.

What would he make of an election where the President of the United States aired an ad that was so racist that some networks, including Fox News, refused to air it? What would he think about the cartoonishly racist robo-calls directed against black candidates? What would he think about the Republican who successfully ran against Gillum in Florida and warned voters not to "monkey this up" by electing his black opponent?

Most important: Did he have any second thoughts about not casting a ballot for Abrams, despite the narrow outcome of her race?

He cut right to the chase and flashed his Ph.D. in wokeology: He told me he figured Abrams' opponent would win because, as Georgia's secretary of state until Thursday, he oversaw the election.

"I don't regret not voting and I don't plan on voting going forward," he told me. "I have absolutely no trust or faith in the US political and justice system."
Someone I know on Facebook put it more succinctly: "F--- the vote."


If Democrats hope to win in 2020, they must somehow do what Obama did in 2008: cut through a lifetime of cynicism among those who think the system is rigged and that change is impossible -- and get them to the polls.

And they must somehow do it after two charismatic black candidates in the South failed to win two big elections after both seemed like they had so much going for them.

2018-11-09

Florida Voting by Gender and Race

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10214963716261147&id=1076006521&comment_id=10214965120456251¬if_t=feed_comment_reply¬if_id=1541603274489965&ref=m_notif

2018-11-06

Go Vote 2018! Make your voice heard! Be sure to Watch Video here, then vote this Election Day TODAY before 7pm!


Go Vote 2018! Make your voice heard! Be sure to Watch Video here, then vote this Election Day TODAY before 7pm!

2018-11-05

Iconic Photograph of Gloria Steinem and Dorothy Pitman-Hughes Recreated Over 40 Years Later



Story by Makers

Raising their fists in solidarity, Dorothy Pitman-Hughes and MAKER Gloria Steinem posed for Dan Wynn in a 1971 issue of Esquire magazine. It's still regarded as one of the most iconic photographs of the feminist movement in the continuous fight for equal rights.

Decades later, in 2014, they joined for a recreation of their original photograph — this time each adopting a soft smile.



"Gloria and Dorothy were phenomenal to share this moment as they stood together side-by-side again," Daniel Bagan, the photographer of the recreated image, said in a statement.

Pitman-Hughes, the lesser known feminist activist, is the co-founder of Ms. Magazine with Steinem, as well as the Women's Action Alliance in 1971.

The photograph led Bagan to create a "The Age of Beauty" series of women over 50, showcasing that with greater age comes greater strength and beauty.

USA VOTE TUESDAY NOVEMBER 6TH, 2018


Raising their fists in solidarity, Gloria Steinem and Dorothy Pitman-Hughes in 1971 and 2014.

Photogenically correct


2018-11-02

Urban One Looks To Close Out 2018 With Big Revenue Bang.


Story by Inside Radio

If Urban One is a harbinger for the rest of the industry, radio is heading for a robust fourth quarter. Heavy demand by political campaigns put intense pressure on TV inventory, sending non-political advertisers to radio, CEO Alfred Liggins told investors Thursday morning. The African American-targeted media company is pacing up 10% in Q4, excluding political advertising, and up 20% with political included in the mix.

“Political tends to sell out TV and then that spills over into radio because TV’s got so much demand on it,” Liggins said during Urban One’s quarterly earnings call. But it’s more than just political and displaced TV advertisers driving the bus. “The radio management team feels good about things and it’s not just all political,” Liggins said. “Our guys feel comfortable about how their stations are positioned.”

While pacings only mark a moment in time, the company is confident enough in where things are heading that it is forecasting revenue to be up by double digits in fourth quarter. “I feel more optimistic going into next year than I have in a while,” Liggins said.

During the Q&A portion of the earnings, investors sounded genuinely excited about the company’s Q4 outlook.

Urban One’s revenue is being bolstered in part by the mid-August purchase of sports “The Team 980” WTEM Washington, DC, from Red Zebra Broadcasting for $4.2 million. The pickup added $800,000 in revenue in third quarter revenue. But even when WTEM’s contributions are backed out of Q4 pacings, Liggins said Urban One is on track to grow year over year revenue by 16% in fourth quarter.

Of course, the company was both a buyer and a seller in Q3, having sold gospel “Praise 102.7” WPZR Detroit (102.7) to Educational Media Foundation for $12.7 million. As part of the deal, EMF transferred three of its Motor City translators to Radio One, allowing it to keep the Detroit Praise Network airing in the market, in combination with its existing translator. The results exceeded Liggins’ expectations. “We kept more revenue and ratings in Detroit than we thought we would,” he said.

Liggins called 2018 an “interesting year” marked by a “volatile market.” It began with what he called a “very challenging first half, followed by a third quarter where Urban One’s radio revenue grew 1.7% in the third quarter – even as total radio revenue in its markets, as reported by Miller Kaplan, declined 3%. CFO Peter Thompson said the company outperformed the market in eight of its markets. Radio ad sales increased 2.5% to $52.1 million from $50.9 million one year earlier.

After all the hype about record political spending it’s not uncommon to hear radio execs say there were disappointed by the category. But that’s not the case here. Urban One has booked $7.1 million in political advertising year to date, which Thompson said was the company’s highest ever in a nonpresidential election year.

Category Blow By Blow

In another encouraging sign, automakers increased their spending with the company by 14% in Q3 as services boosted their allocations by 16%. Entertainment spending increased about 2%, healthcare grew 7%, travel and transportation ticked up by a high percent (but from a small base) and government/public spending jumped by a whopping 23%. “Those were the big drivers,” Thompson said. On the other hand, telecom spending fell 14% and retail was down double digits.

In addition to the impact of political, strong ratings in Washington, Atlanta and Houston were also cited by Liggins for the positive outlook. The Atlanta cluster “has been a killer all year long,” despite a market that was down 11% in the first half of the year. Houston is a big revenue driver for Radio One. Liggins said the market has overcome a revenue hit from a new H-Town competitor that signed on a few year ago. That, combined with rebounding oil prices pushed Houston out of the red and into the back. “We’ve lapped three years of competitive pressure and the market has gotten healthier.”

For third quarter, Atlanta, Indianapolis and Philadelphia posted the biggest declines while Columbus, Dallas, Houston, Raleigh and Washington, DC reported growth.

Liggins and Thomson declined to offer any specifics on how Urban On intends to refinance its debt. Liggins would only say that the company is “very focused” on it and is having “deep discussions about our options” — and that Urban One should have info on the refi direction in the near term.

Burrowing deeper into the company’s Q3 numbers, billings from the Reach Media syndication segment increased 3.2% to $10.8 million. Total company billings decreased 1.2% to $110.7 million from $112.1 million for the same period in 2017.

Radio accounts for almost half of Urban One’s billings. Revenue from the company’s TV One cable channel dipped with advertising down 7.9% to $19.2 million and affiliate fees off 1.2% to $26.2 million. Revenue from events tumbled 35.6% to $3.5 million and digital jumped 7.9% to $8.7 million. While small in comparison, Q3 political dollars rocketed up 277% to $917,000 from $243,000 in the non-election year of 2017.

Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA, a measure of cash flow) jumped 11.4% $37.8 million. That growth “puts us in a great position to hit or exceed our full year guidance of $140 million,” Liggins said. “As TV One heads into the new broadcast calendar year, we are optimistic that the recent declines in cable TV advertising can be reversed, and we continue to manage our costs prudently, enabling the business to grow its cash flow in a challenging marketplace."